Do Democrats Own The Terms 'Racism" and
"Lying"?
Democrats have run a number on Republicans.
They have skillfully captured certain words in the American
lexicon and redefined them, applying Democrat-themed meanings for the specific
purpose of cowing Republicans into silence and submission. I have watched the
escalation of this vocabulary abuse for almost a decade, and I am sorry to say,
this particular Democrat scheme is working.
Republicans seem afraid to speak the unvarnished truth about
Democrat party leaders for fear of reprisals in the mainstream media, an
organization that has repeatedly proved that it is indisputably in the tank for
Barack Obama.
What are Republicans afraid to say?
Republicans seem afraid to say that Barack Obama, 44th
president of the United States, seems to be a racist and a liar whose clumsy,
inexperienced efforts at leadership have put our nation’s economy and our
citizens’ safety in jeopardy and has proven incompetent and unfit for office.
Meanwhile, Democrats seem quite comfortable throwing labels
of “racism” and “lying” about freely when they attack Republicans, comfortable
in the knowledge that no Republican dare do the same. With full support and
acquiescence from a compromised media that long ago lost its objectivity,
charges of “racism” and “lying” have morphed into an Orwellian fog, becoming
purely political terms to browbeat Republicans, allowing Democrat leaders to
dodge the discussion of tough issues.
Americans have seen “racist” tendencies from Democrats who
reflexively jump to the assumption that any white Republican who disagrees with
Obama’s failed policies is doing so because Obama is a Black man. Meanwhile,
many Democrats openly support Obama for the simple reason that he is Black.
Furthermore, Obama’s surrogates are quick to circle the wagons and level
accusations of “racism” should anyone point out their obvious, raced-based
prejudices.
When Obama was elected president by a majority of Americans,
it sure seemed that the race-baiting which went on during the 2008 campaign
would finally have to be put to rest. But, in the past three years since Obama’s
election, the “racist” moniker seems to be flung about with even more frequency
than before the election.
In addition, too many Democrats have shown that they do not
understand the definition of racism and, instead, seems to think that racism is
a one-way street—that it only exists as a White against Black issue. In
reality, any person who immediately assumes that a person’s actions towards
them are solely based on one’s ethnic origin may be exhibiting symptoms of
racism.
Still, almost anyone who criticizes Obama and the Democrats’
failed policies is labeled as a “racist”. When Black Republicans, such as me,
criticize the president’s failed policies, Democrats know that the “racist”
moniker won’t work, so instead, we are attacked as “traitors to our race”, or
the media tries to portray us as stupid or corrupt.
But if a president’s policies are bad, if they fail to
achieve their objectives (such as Cash for Clunkers, Cash for Caulkers, green
energy investment initiatives, the “summer of recovery” or the Stimulus) is it
really “racist” to criticize the policy or to think that the American people
deserve better—even if the policy is advocated by a Black man? Is it “racist”
to criticize the president because he has failed to submit a viable budget to congress
for the past four years, or just incompetence on the part of the president?
The president also seems to be a liar. According to Webster,
a liar is “a person who tells lies”, who deliberately “makes an untrue
statement with the intent to deceive; to create a false or misleading
impression.”
Isn’t that exactly what Obama has done when he says: he
didn’t really know or hear the Rev. Jeremiah Wright preach anti-American
sentiments, or when he writes about events that are patently untrue in his
autobiography, Dreams of My Father, or when Obama deliberately tells lies about
Romney and Bain Capital, or when Obama deliberately lies about the debt
ceiling, or when Obama tries to claim the attack on the U.S. embassy in Libya
was not terrorism?
What about other Democrat leaders? Such as when Harry Reid
claims that Mitt Romney didn’t pay his taxes? Or whenEric Holder says he knew
nothing about Fast and Furious? Or when Elizabeth Warren claims she is part
Native American so she can game a hiring system which is tilted in favor of
quotas and minorities?
In the past three and a half years, Republicans have worn
out the pages of the thesaurus looking for euphemisms for lying. Republican
punditry, speeches and writings are chock full of alternatives: mislead, mischaracterize,
misrepresent, untruth, misspeak, prevaricate, fabricate, story, taradiddle,
fairy tale, inaccurate, falsehoods, dishonest, distortion, whopper, canard,
deceit, stretching the truth.
Supposedly, according to Republican “strategists”, using the
word “lie” is too direct, too brutal, too hostile and might coarsen the
dialogue between political parties. Using the word “liar”, they contend, would
lead to vicious attacks from the mainstream media and would cause Republicans
to lose respect or votes or the moral high ground. But, I would hate to hear
what these Republican pundits think is too coarse or too harsh, if they think
that the attacks from Democrat leaders over the past few years have been
friendly banter.
When did our country slip so far, fall so low, that we have
become so handcuffed by political correctness that we are unable to call a
thing by its true name? Socrates understood that watering down one’s language
does not change the truth or make it more palatable, just more confusing.
Our founding fathers understood that too. Our founding
fathers were some of the most courageous and least politically correct folks of
their century (think Ben Franklin).
Their willingness to speak the truth as they saw it may be
one of the reasons why they had the courage to attack tyranny and hypocrisy and
hold up the flawed policies of a greedy and ignorant king for the world to see,
and in doing so, lay the foundations for the greatest free government in the
history of the world.
Republicans need to stop being cowed by rants of “racism”
and they need to stop trying to find ways to soften the reality of Obama’s
widespread and repeated deceptions.
Perhaps Wednesday’s debate might be a great place to start.
Lurita Doan Townhall.com 10/1/2012
